Sleeping Beauty at the London Palladium is a spectacle that has captivated audiences for a decade, but is it truly a worthy celebration of the beloved post-war institution? This year's production, featuring the likes of Julian Clary, Nigel Havers, and Catherine Tate, has sparked controversy with its excessive use of innuendo and smut, leaving some patrons feeling uncomfortable. The show, with its tale of a curse lifted, is a commercial success, but is it honoring the prestigious heritage of panto? The absence of children in the audience, a key part of the panto experience, is a concern. While the cast delivers droll performances, the show's reliance on innuendo and smut may be a turn-off for younger generations. The question remains: is this panto truly worth the top price of £275? The controversy and differing opinions are what make this production a must-see, but be warned, it may not be for the faint of heart or those seeking a traditional panto experience.
